Bits & Notes

tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-79301602009-02-21T07:07:54.085+02:00Bits & NotesPanoshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00737768575023094850noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7930160.post-1149253225285470722006-06-02T15:58:00.000+03:002006-10-10T13:40:43.480+03:00VS 2005 Web Application Projects, MSBuild, and Continuous Integrations

Scott Guthrie on Continuous Integrations.

Panoshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00737768575023094850noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7930160.post-1149252827225336372006-06-02T15:47:00.000+03:002006-06-02T15:53:47.263+03:00ASP.NET 2.0 Localization

Source: Scott Guthrie's BlogSome resources on the new localization features for ASP.NET 2.0:Localization in ASP.NET 2.0 - by Wei-Meng Lee - 08/08/2005ASP.NET 2.0 Localization Features: A Fresh Approach to Localizing Web Applications - by Michèle Leroux Bustamante, IDesign Inc, October 2004 [Updated April 2006]Localization in ASP.NET 2.0 - by Bilal Haidar - 05 May 2006

Panoshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00737768575023094850noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7930160.post-1149244732977050812006-06-02T13:38:00.000+03:002006-06-02T14:32:16.686+03:00The Development Abstraction Layer

The Development Abstraction Layer: An excellent piece from Joel Spolsky.

Panoshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00737768575023094850noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7930160.post-1149202738661286232006-06-02T01:58:00.000+03:002006-06-02T14:51:51.146+03:00Jesus Rodriguez on WWF

The Persistence Service and The Transaction Service

Panoshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00737768575023094850noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7930160.post-1149201843357707242006-06-02T01:44:00.000+03:002006-06-02T16:23:10.396+03:00BPM Think Tank: BPMN Technology Roundtable

Sandy Kemsley blogs her notes for the BPMN Technology Roundtable of the BPM Think Tank 2006. Two important quotes: OMG is not recommending XPDL for serialization of BPMN, but recommends the use of BPDM.[There are] some ideas about defining aspects of a process, such as security, escalation and exception handling, in order to simplify the primary representation. The aspects would be invoked

Panoshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00737768575023094850noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7930160.post-1149201405265820962006-06-02T01:36:00.000+03:002006-06-02T16:35:56.766+03:00On the differences of BPEL and XPDL

Sources:Go Flow : The BPMN-XPDL-BPEL value chain by Keith SwensonBPM Think Tank Day 2: Panel on Business Value of Process Standards by Sandy KemsleyBPM Think Tank Day 3: XPDL technology roundtable by Sandy KemsleySwenson [Fujitsu] came back to the issue of XPDL versus BPEL, which he doesn't see as competing. XPDL is about process design, about serializing and saving what you drew in BPMN, and

Panoshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00737768575023094850noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7930160.post-1149200276020929222006-06-02T01:17:00.000+03:002006-06-02T16:42:05.126+03:00Is Workflow "Back"? (Did It Ever Go Away?)

Bruce Silver's opinion for the usage of the term "workflow":So… is workflow “back”? In one way I think it is, with the growing recognition among the orchestration-style vendors that the action today in the BPM market is focused around human work, not application integration. I think that’s what motivated BEA-Fuego, why IBM and SAP are now behind BPEL4People (when they could have done human tasks

Panoshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00737768575023094850noreply@blogger.com0